Thus it is estimated from UN Population Division and medical literature data that in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories post-invasion non-violent deaths from Occupier-imposed deprivation total 0.2 million, 1.1 million and 3.5 million, respectively; post-invasion violent deaths total 12,000, 1.4 million and about 1 million, respectively; post-invasion violent plus non-violent avoidable deaths total 0.3 million, 2.5 million and 4.5 million, respectively (4.4 million for Iraq, 1990-2010); post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.2 million, 0.8 million and 2.4 million, respectively (2.0 million for Iraq, 1990-2010); and refugees total 7 million, 5-6 million and 3-4 million, respectively , with a further 2.5 million refugees generated in NW Pakistan – Holocausts (huge numbers of deaths) and also Genocides as defined by Article 2 of the UN Genocide Convention (see “Muslim Holocaust, Muslim Genocide”). A further 0.8 million people have died worldwide from opiate drug-related causes due to US Alliance restoration of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry from 6% of world market share in 2001 to over 90% now (see UN ODC).

In his 2005 Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech, Jewish British Literature Nobel laureate Harold Pinter stated: “We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it ‘bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East’.
How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice.”

Ten million? More than enough, I would have thought.

Certainly a debasement of thought, or is it a debasement of language?

But is he incapable of speaking English? the language, as is every other language, is full of SYNONYMS.

But as the law is the last refuge of a scoundrel so is this brand of pedantry. Does he take us for idiots??

His presentation before the committee, such as I saw on local tv, had him absolutely exude moral guilt from every pore

That Blair is delusional does not make him medically ill. Their is a growing body of evidence that insanity is not a medical condition and therefore is not in the purview of doctors. Madness is a moral state for which the sufferer is fully accountable: thus i reject the insanity defense outright. Moreover there is no help that psychiatrists can offer anyone. All they can do is bully and drug to coerce conformity, or at best tell soothing lies.

I know these things as i was once diagnosed by psychiatrists after my devastation by a religious cult some 25 years ago. the ONLY way out for me was to reject their pseudo scientific babble and take responsbility for the moral choices whereby i became a gull for cults in the first place. Those who refuse this become lifelong invalids.

I suggest all interested parties read the antipsychiatric literature

Secondly I do not take it that Blair is less than human because of his evil. Au contraire. Such evil is humanity par excellence, it is what is to be expected from the human race

Blair is mad – if psychiatrists gave him tests to measure his ability to feel remorse they would show that Blair is incapable of understanding the concept. One can see the look of puzzlement on his face sometimes when he is asked a question which relates to remorse. He is not quite sure of the concept. Sad, dangerous man.