This guy is just a sorry looking, sorry thinking dummy.

He also ignores the history of his own people, who found succour among the Muslims against the pogroms at the time of the Crusades etc. After all the Great Rabbi Moses ben Maimon, also known as Maimonides or Rambam, was based in Muslim Spain. This changed after 1492 because of the cruelty of the Reconquistas but the middle ages lasted about 1000 years

But Feiglin hates. That is what keeps him warm at nights, he does not want historical truth, only excuses for his hate

Here’s a diddy for you: Israel claims that criticism is “anti-semitic” and that it represents all Jews. If you refer to Israeli policies and practices as “Jewish” policies and practices, however, you are also an “anti-Semite.” How can Israel = Jews and yet if Hagel uses the term “Jewish lobby” he is anti-semitic. Should he have said “Israeli lobby”? Would that have been less “anti-semitic”? How so? Or he is disallowed from referring to Israel (Jews) altogether? You see — just like Atzmon points out — “Jewish” is patent nonsense and Israel is bs.

In your last argument you are saying that Israel must be chastised for CLAIMING to be westernized and failing. Because of our previous discussion, this means that it’s OK for a country to behave badly as long as it does not CLAIM to be civilised. How then will we encourage improvement in these other countries?

Since Mr. Brezinski’s comments are nothing more than the same old tired hasbara, I will not waste my energy or time on them. But I will say that I find it amusing how zionists so doggedly stick to the same old rubbish no matter how the political landscape changes. Having nothing new to say would compel most normal people to simply keep their mouths shut (or their hands off their keyboards, as the case may be).

Israel violates international law repeatedly with immunity. Better, I think, if international law is enforced worldwide and we can all forgo the criticism. Israel can aggressively annex lands through force, in violation of the central tenet of the UN, but it will not, at the same time, command a good reputation. That will not happen as long as people can see and think.

I did answer your question about, “reference to OTHER unacceptable regimes..” but it was a little subtle and you are too bull-headed to have noticed.

Any bad behaviour must be subject to correction and that correction should be in line with what similar offenders receive. This is the basis of case law.

If Israel is guilty of crimes and others also guilty of them, all should be meted similar punishments. In this case, Israel is pitted against regional jurisdictions that are quite obviously guilty of pretty much everything Israel is accused of. By ignoring these other “crimes,” a precedent is set whereby it is not fair to punish just Israel.

Further, a reasonable investigator would be suspicious of the fact that only one country was consistently being singled out – see my UN example. That would raise the distinct possibility that the one country was being used as a scapegoat and might not even be guilty at all.