<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Rights v Tyranny</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No way</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-361542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No way]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-361542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad to see you back....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see you back&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Battersby</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-297434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Battersby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-297434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The élites of this world believe in Poverty as they see it as the basis of their wealth.

Patrick Colquhoun, a merchant who set up England’s first private “preventative police “ force to prevent dock workers from supplementing their meager wages with stolen goods, provided what may be the most lucid explanation of how hunger and poverty correlate to productivity and wealth creation:
Poverty is that state and condition in society where the individual has no surplus labour in store, or, in other words, no property or means of subsistence but what is derived from the constant exercise of industry in the various occupations of life. Poverty is therefore a most necessary and indispensable ingredient in society, without which nations and communities could not exist in a state of civilization. It is the lot of man. It is the source of wealth, since without poverty, there could be no labour; there could be no riches, no refinement, no comfort, and no benefit to those who may be possessed of wealth.

This is what our so called élite think. Make of it what you will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The élites of this world believe in Poverty as they see it as the basis of their wealth.</p>
<p>Patrick Colquhoun, a merchant who set up England’s first private “preventative police “ force to prevent dock workers from supplementing their meager wages with stolen goods, provided what may be the most lucid explanation of how hunger and poverty correlate to productivity and wealth creation:<br />
Poverty is that state and condition in society where the individual has no surplus labour in store, or, in other words, no property or means of subsistence but what is derived from the constant exercise of industry in the various occupations of life. Poverty is therefore a most necessary and indispensable ingredient in society, without which nations and communities could not exist in a state of civilization. It is the lot of man. It is the source of wealth, since without poverty, there could be no labour; there could be no riches, no refinement, no comfort, and no benefit to those who may be possessed of wealth.</p>
<p>This is what our so called élite think. Make of it what you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Battersby</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-297412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Battersby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-297412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can still turn Psychopaths from ruthless genocide warriors into wanton children which is where they need to be if we want to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can still turn Psychopaths from ruthless genocide warriors into wanton children which is where they need to be if we want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Battersby</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-297407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Battersby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 00:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-297407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always thought that Laws and Rights are opposites. Laws create and protect élites and their power and dominance over others. Rights empower all and create citizens. Police and military are mobilised for laws against rights. The opposite should be the case but that élite control them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that Laws and Rights are opposites. Laws create and protect élites and their power and dominance over others. Rights empower all and create citizens. Police and military are mobilised for laws against rights. The opposite should be the case but that élite control them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-263209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-263209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great speech, indeed. 

Incidentally, the defeat in the Commons of the motion to attack Syria was largely due to party politics. I believe the opposition tabled a minor amendment which was also defeated in a tit for tat fashion. In other words, if I am not mistaken, both parties were willing to ignore public opinion, but party politics saved the day! In fact public opposition to the war on Iraq was even greater, but the &#039;lobby&#039; made sure then that there was consensus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great speech, indeed. </p>
<p>Incidentally, the defeat in the Commons of the motion to attack Syria was largely due to party politics. I believe the opposition tabled a minor amendment which was also defeated in a tit for tat fashion. In other words, if I am not mistaken, both parties were willing to ignore public opinion, but party politics saved the day! In fact public opposition to the war on Iraq was even greater, but the &#8216;lobby&#8217; made sure then that there was consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fakhri</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-260736</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fakhri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 10:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-260736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to see&#039;re you back, Alan, and hope you will continue.
Your post is not only head-on right, but is an absolute necessity
to remind everybody of who the real culprits fighting against our
humanity are. Yes, they are the USA and the West. Obama was framed by Kerry- both massive hypocrites- a fortnight ago, and almost went to war against another Middle East country under a flimsy pretext based on a doctored video by American stooges.He couldn&#039;t have cared less how many thousands he would have killed or how many refugees or displaced people created or how many symbols of culture he would have destroyed!All under a false pretence based on un-substanciated claims.Is it any use reiterating what Agent Orange did to Vietnamese villagers living in poverty?We all know of the frightening numbers of deformed foetuses and newborns in Falluga city in Iraq following the visits of American boots nine years ago.Need we recite Hiroshima and Nagasaki?How about the depleted uranium the Israelis used in south Lebanon in 2006 or the white phosphorus they used in Gaza in 2008 and 2011?
 True the UN in its current set-up is out-dated and ineffective; but if and when it is reformed, the new UN must address some old business.By the same token that German officers were tried post-WW2,or the late Slobodan Milosevic were tried post-WW2,the big murderers of post-1945 roaming free or more bizarrely awarded diplomatic posts, must be tried and handed their deserved punishments.The International Criminal Court must have the reach and the teeth to bring big criminals like George W Bush&amp; Tony Blair and Ihud Barack&amp; Gabi Ashkenazi to trial,better than chasing some petty criminals in Africa.This last quote illustrates the absurdity of the UN organs, as their might can be leashed only against the weakest and the poorest.
 Until that ailment is redressed, the world will continue to be a big jungle, and the biggest beasts will continue to diturb and upset the peace on our earth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see&#8217;re you back, Alan, and hope you will continue.<br />
Your post is not only head-on right, but is an absolute necessity<br />
to remind everybody of who the real culprits fighting against our<br />
humanity are. Yes, they are the USA and the West. Obama was framed by Kerry- both massive hypocrites- a fortnight ago, and almost went to war against another Middle East country under a flimsy pretext based on a doctored video by American stooges.He couldn&#8217;t have cared less how many thousands he would have killed or how many refugees or displaced people created or how many symbols of culture he would have destroyed!All under a false pretence based on un-substanciated claims.Is it any use reiterating what Agent Orange did to Vietnamese villagers living in poverty?We all know of the frightening numbers of deformed foetuses and newborns in Falluga city in Iraq following the visits of American boots nine years ago.Need we recite Hiroshima and Nagasaki?How about the depleted uranium the Israelis used in south Lebanon in 2006 or the white phosphorus they used in Gaza in 2008 and 2011?<br />
 True the UN in its current set-up is out-dated and ineffective; but if and when it is reformed, the new UN must address some old business.By the same token that German officers were tried post-WW2,or the late Slobodan Milosevic were tried post-WW2,the big murderers of post-1945 roaming free or more bizarrely awarded diplomatic posts, must be tried and handed their deserved punishments.The International Criminal Court must have the reach and the teeth to bring big criminals like George W Bush&amp; Tony Blair and Ihud Barack&amp; Gabi Ashkenazi to trial,better than chasing some petty criminals in Africa.This last quote illustrates the absurdity of the UN organs, as their might can be leashed only against the weakest and the poorest.<br />
 Until that ailment is redressed, the world will continue to be a big jungle, and the biggest beasts will continue to diturb and upset the peace on our earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Morley</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-260053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Morley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-260053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lovely to see you back in action, Alan! Thank you for sharing this speech. You are absolutely right about the selective application of human rights by governments. A recent example: After losing the vote on the Syria (armed intervention) motion, David Cameron told the House of Commons &quot;I got that&quot;. We may have thought that meant he understood that the people and their representatives wanted no more war. A fortnight later he spoke for the first time in public about that event. And what he told his listeners (the Holocauast Educational Trust) was not that he understood that the people wanted no more war - oh no! But that their representatives (and presumably also they themselves) would later feel ashamed for having forgotten the lessons of the Holocaust. Yet when Israel bombed Gaza for three weeks with white phosphorus, I don&#039;t recall him wagging his finger at the prime minister of the time saying: &quot;Remember the lessons of the Holocaust; otherwise, if you take no action against Israel now, you will later feel ashamed.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely to see you back in action, Alan! Thank you for sharing this speech. You are absolutely right about the selective application of human rights by governments. A recent example: After losing the vote on the Syria (armed intervention) motion, David Cameron told the House of Commons &#8220;I got that&#8221;. We may have thought that meant he understood that the people and their representatives wanted no more war. A fortnight later he spoke for the first time in public about that event. And what he told his listeners (the Holocauast Educational Trust) was not that he understood that the people wanted no more war &#8211; oh no! But that their representatives (and presumably also they themselves) would later feel ashamed for having forgotten the lessons of the Holocaust. Yet when Israel bombed Gaza for three weeks with white phosphorus, I don&#8217;t recall him wagging his finger at the prime minister of the time saying: &#8220;Remember the lessons of the Holocaust; otherwise, if you take no action against Israel now, you will later feel ashamed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ortiz</title>
		<link>http://www.alanhart.net/human-rights-v-tyranny/comment-page-1/#comment-259973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Ortiz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alanhart.net/?p=2369#comment-259973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan, I admire your remarks and well-structured concerns. I would say that any intelligent (or even intellectual)human being would conclude your statement is not over-stated, except for one thing: You fail to clearly name (or call out) the culprits, as well as failure to suggest how we (mankind)can solve this problem.

Most of us pundits (in the know)have sufficient knowledge and recognize who the enemy is. You can call them Jesuits, Zionists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Bilderbergs, CFR, Committee of 300, or whatever (I call them Mammonites), they are groups of people whose only concerns is to amass enough power and money to control humanity and to outright destroy Christianity and any or all who believe in Jesus Christ.

They already have control of most of the world government&#039;s leaders and finances, including the United States. All of humanity is in their clutches and power. Yet, most of those in the know, would rather comment or beat to death minor issues(such as how many Jews were killed during the 2 WW)rather than directly point the finger, in fear of being labeled an &quot;Anti-Semite.&quot;

I work all day long compiling more than sufficient data, which there is a plethora of it documented on the Internet and other sources, (if only people are wise enough and take the time to know where to look) and I present as much of this evidence as I can (to the masses), especially to those who call themselves Christian, but who are mere Zionist puppets and dupes who are being controlled by the extremely clever Mammonite Media Manipulators, which includes many clever bloggers I can name, which will be accomplished in the near future.

Shalom! 

Joe Ortiz, author
Why Christians Will Suffer Great Tribulation
The End Times Passover
Saved? What Do You Mean Saved?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, I admire your remarks and well-structured concerns. I would say that any intelligent (or even intellectual)human being would conclude your statement is not over-stated, except for one thing: You fail to clearly name (or call out) the culprits, as well as failure to suggest how we (mankind)can solve this problem.</p>
<p>Most of us pundits (in the know)have sufficient knowledge and recognize who the enemy is. You can call them Jesuits, Zionists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Bilderbergs, CFR, Committee of 300, or whatever (I call them Mammonites), they are groups of people whose only concerns is to amass enough power and money to control humanity and to outright destroy Christianity and any or all who believe in Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>They already have control of most of the world government&#8217;s leaders and finances, including the United States. All of humanity is in their clutches and power. Yet, most of those in the know, would rather comment or beat to death minor issues(such as how many Jews were killed during the 2 WW)rather than directly point the finger, in fear of being labeled an &#8220;Anti-Semite.&#8221;</p>
<p>I work all day long compiling more than sufficient data, which there is a plethora of it documented on the Internet and other sources, (if only people are wise enough and take the time to know where to look) and I present as much of this evidence as I can (to the masses), especially to those who call themselves Christian, but who are mere Zionist puppets and dupes who are being controlled by the extremely clever Mammonite Media Manipulators, which includes many clever bloggers I can name, which will be accomplished in the near future.</p>
<p>Shalom! </p>
<p>Joe Ortiz, author<br />
Why Christians Will Suffer Great Tribulation<br />
The End Times Passover<br />
Saved? What Do You Mean Saved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
