Comments on: Memo to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon: The door on a two-state solution was closed 45 years ago

By: Andrej

Andrej — Mon, 06 Jul 2015 23:41:06 +0000

I would suggest a new ozgrniaation of Free Republics with Limited Powers (FRLP). It would have a bicameral legislature with the number of representitives in one house proportional to GDP, the other proportional to Population. The member state legislatures would elect representatives to the population body, and proxies would be gathered to vote for the GDP body. The FRLP would conduct audits of member governments, guarantee individual rights. Members governments would pay a fee to join, and a second fee to remain a member each year. Member states would gain trade and defense advantages.

By: TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » Memo to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon: The Door on a Two-State Solution Was Closed 45 Years Ago

Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:03:15 +0000

[...] working to a Security Council background briefing, in the covert diplomacy of the search for peace.Go to Original – alanhart.net Join the BDS-BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS campaign to protest the Israeli barbaric siege of [...]

By: #PALESTINE NEWS | Sept 28, 2012 | Occupied Palestine | فلسطين

#PALESTINE NEWS | Sept 28, 2012 | Occupied Palestine | فلسطين — Sun, 30 Sep 2012 07:23:04 +0000

[...] Memo to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon: The door on a two-state solution was closed 45 years ago – Alan Hart http://www.alanhart.net/memo-to-un-secretary-general-ban-ki-moon-the-door-on-a-two-state-solution-wa… [...]

By: Bob Battersby

Bob Battersby — Sat, 29 Sep 2012 09:16:46 +0000

The UN was clearly party to the problem in the first place. Perhaps became an instrument for promoting conflict rather than for peace: The UN as an instrument of Colonial Enterprise! Yes, I feel the British (under pressure from American Zionists in particular) did indeed wash their hands of Palestine. The Zionist hawks bumped off Bernadotte because he saw the solution as being under International not Zionist control. Given Israeli hawks desire to go a bombing when it suits them (or their masters) I don’t think anyone believes in a so called two-state solution. I feel the only way forward is a democratic secular Palestine with equal rights for all.

By: k_w

k_w — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:22:29 +0000

What is hardly known is that Israel recognized resolutions 181 and 194 as valid in the process of her admission to the United Nations. The Zionists even used the 194 to press the Soviet Union to allow their Jews’ emigration to Israel. That’s what I call chutzpah.

By: Scott Doidge

Scott Doidge — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:50:29 +0000

There is now only one solution left to resolving this intractable problem, and one which would be taken up by any oppressed people: a military solution. The author is correct; everything Zionism has touched has become corrupted. Today the UN is meaningless.

By: Rehmat

Rehmat — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:22:21 +0000

Historically, the door to the illegal two-state concept proposed by the Balfour Declaration (1917) was closed in May 1948 when David Ben Gurion declared unilateral creation of Israel on the 55% of the historic Palestine.

There is only one option to resolve the Zionist problem in the Middle East. That’s a single Palestinian state with equal rights for both the Natives and the alien Jews – under a democratic secularist governance.

http://rehmat1.com/2010/06/18/palestine-the-third-option/

By: William Smart

William Smart — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:02:15 +0000

@ Richard Steven Hack said… “As many no doubt know, the UN had a subcommittee studying the issue of whether it had the legal authority to partition Palestine. The committee concluded and reported to the UNSC that the UNSC did NOT have that authority under international law, but only the authority to implement the Palestinian Mandate of the League of Nations.”

Really? Where’s that?

However, the UNSC overruled that decision due to its fears over the consequences of not partitioning Palestine, given the hostility in the region and that the British were washing their hands of it.

Really? The UNSC refused to rubber-stamp the GA resolution 181 and passed other resolutions stopping the Zionists from changing the political arrangements. And appointed Count Bernadotte as the legal successor to the Mandate.

I’m not sure the UNSC is at fault, except in so far as it has failed to put its wishes into action.

By: greg wilkinson

greg wilkinson — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:56:35 +0000

Who drafted 242, and deleted ‘the’ before ‘territories’? Was our Hugh Foot responsible? Is there a discrepancy between English and French versions, and how does it look in Arabic?

By: #PALESTINE NEWS | Sept 27, 2012 | Occupied Palestine | فلسطين

#PALESTINE NEWS | Sept 27, 2012 | Occupied Palestine | فلسطين — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 06:24:34 +0000