Truth is a very long term thing. It requires starting at the beginning and proceeding, step by logical step, to the end. In the real world of politics, that never happens. Politics is full of interruptions and detours. What was true yesterday is irrelevant today. A politician concerns himself with the here and now. Yesterday is to be forgotten as soon as possible. Let no one suggest that yesterday might have something to do the problems of today.

No politician beating the anti-terrorist drums would dare to suggest that the so-called terrorist problem might have something to do with the expulsion of 700,000 Arabs into the desert in 1948. Terrorism is all about Arabs hating Americans and their “freedoms”. U.S. support for Israel has nothing to do with it because Israel is a “democracy”, just like America. The British empire betrayed the Arabs to the Jews, back in the days of the First World War, you say? What voter, who never even heard of the First World War, cares about that? The Zionist leaders once said they were never going to create a Jewish state in Arab Palestine? Why, that’s like saying that FDR promised to reduce federal spending when he took office in 1933. Who wants to recall musty details in the historical closet?

In the here and now, AIPAC wants your support of Israel as the price of a campaign contribution. Quoting history books shall not get you the campaign contribution. The TV networks shall pay you good money to pontificate on Israel’s need to protect itself from a terrorist threat. But they will not pay you to discover broken promises of the 1920’s or “contracts with Jewry”. If you want to sit in a research library and read forgotten facts, go ahead. But don’t expect to make the moolah by telling the truth to the voting public. That would never do.

Alan Hart, the former BBC reporter and author of “Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews” has just sold his house to avoid bankruptcy. It is the price he had to pay to self-publish his very unpopular, truth telling volumes. Hart could not, of course, get any mainline, Jewish controlled publisher to produce his volumes. That would be impossible. He essentially had to mortgage his future to get the truth out. Now, in his farewell message, he admits the harsh truth that so many have had to face – it is hopeless. The enemy has the money and the blackout capacity. The truth is available to those who seek it, naturally. But there is no way the truth will get out to the vast masses who know only what they are told.

Hart realized that telling the truth about the Zionist Frankenstein’s monster in Palestine would only destroy his career with the BBC and alienate him from his friends. Thus, he wisely waited until his stint with the BBC was over before he embarked on his exceedingly well documented expose of the truth. But it still cost him his house. Hart is not the first nor will he be the last to suffer financial destruction at the hands of the Zionists. David Irving, Marge Schott and Mel Gibson and many others have suffered the same fate. The Zionists do not tolerate the truth and anyone who tells the truth, like the late Robert John, author of “The Palestine Diary”, shall suffer the consequences.

Mr. Hart, it is wonderful to find people that are willing to tell the truth about what happened to the Palestinians. All one has to do is look at Chomsky & Finklestein to see the grief they get for their truthfulness. They are my heros and I’m adding your name to the list. All the best to you and yours, you’ve earned it. Jennifer Benson

You will remain always on my heart and head … Perhaps you have not wone money but you gain RESPECT and LOVE of so many people…

I promise to myself to continue your work and devote my live as you’ve done to the Truth and justice.
I promise to myself to help you : i will buy inchallah your books

why do you assume that physical descent of all living jews today would justify the crimes of a zionist faction thereof in the land of palestine today, such that you have to undercut the crimes by denying said common descent?

I see no logical connection between decent from Abraham and any asserted right to commit crimes against humanity.

Besides it is not true that modern jews have no decent from Abraham and the patriarchs. But according to your thinking my position has no coherence.

I appeal to morality and you appeal to race, or lack thereof.

You wound your own credibility and present a historical straw man.

would you have me believe there was no other alternative to opposing the crimes of the Zionists other than denying their Hebraic descent?

I hold they ARE descended from Abraham but this gives them no carte blanche to play the holocaust card and commit crimes.

This is the line of the Orthodox Religious Jews and with minor reservations the one I take