Comments on: The Enduring Power of Zionism’s Propaganda Lies

By: Jack Dresser

Jack Dresser — Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:08:25 +0000

P.S. I also note two other disparities between the Wikipedia story and yours in the book that should be resolved. They report the demand was for release of 234 prisoners, and there were 8 terrorists, with 5 killed (as you report) and 3 captured.

By: pabelmont

pabelmont — Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:45:35 +0000

Interesting story, parallel to the 1967 war. Whether or not Egypt’s actions before the war were sufficiently violent (or sufficiently provocative) to constitute the “first shots”, undoubtedly the major violence came from Israel and was unnecessary at the time it came. Israeli leaders have said they knew Egypt would not attack them.

So, as you report here, and in 1967, the same modus operandi: a small (if violent) Arab step followed by a large and intransigent we-will-not-negotiate-with-terrorists violent step by Israel.

And when the Arabs refuse to take the small first step, Israel does it for them and then treats the (small) Arab second step as a “first step” and hits “back” with maximum force.

All possible only because of a complaisant international media.

By: Niels Jespersen

Niels Jespersen — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 05:39:41 +0000

Alan,

You say that you have documentation – however, some years ago (when the movie directed by Spielberg about Munich appeared) I tried to convey the message of your book in a reader commentary.

I met complete disbelief.

I tried then to find other surces than your book to document the case – but found none really.

Do you have supplemntary (other sources than those referred to in your book) sources to subsatntiate your story?

Best regards,

By: Anutosh

Anutosh — Tue, 24 Dec 2013 06:20:23 +0000

I agree with you that playing the victim role is wrong and counterproductive for Israel.

I just watched Nelson Mandela presentation during the town hall meeting in NewYork in 1990 were his very principled stand on what is right was impressive but also unusual position for a politician (see http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article37191.htm).
What a pity that the Israelis could not possibly follow this route, the present route only leads to disaster for the jews and for the whole world. For this reason, showing compassion and pity to the Israelis (and to the jews) might bring the present government of Israeli in a much more embarrassing position.
What is your opinion?

By: Rehmat

Rehmat — Mon, 23 Dec 2013 12:45:56 +0000

Dear Allan, I’m many people will disagree with you on this one.

The 1972 Munich Olympic Games “massacre” was not as it seemed, and was actually a Mossad operation conducted by their agent, Abu Nidal, to garner sympathy for the criminal state of Israel.

Abu Nidal was NOT a Palestinian resistance fighter (terrorist) that he was made out to be, but was actually working for the CIA and Mossad.

http://rehmat1.com/2011/10/26/2012-london-olympics-and-mossad/

http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.ca/2012/07/the-munich-1972-massacre-was-psyops.html