Comments on: The folly of the Israeli AND Arab approach to Iran http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/ Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:34:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40 By: Gloria Vargas http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-10467 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:09:37 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-10467 The extent of the disconnect between the populations of most Arab countries and their Israel-supporting governments is quite breathtaking too. See the latest annual Zogby poll of Middle-Eastern opinion at: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Arab_Opinion_Poll_2010.pdf

]]> By: majid http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9758 Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:57:45 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9758 that was very grate .related to Iran & Arabs the analisis is perfect . and also shows in Washigton there is no will to attack Iran .

]]> By: Elandalussii http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9755 Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:01:11 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9755 Balanced article, Mr. Hart. You wrote:
“…It’s a question of whether Wikileaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments… ”

May I suggest a third possibility: to force hypocrites arab leaders to follow strictly what US and Zionists want them to do without balking. These “leaks” are a warning to those regimes to let them know that US can bring in the public place what they hide to their people.

]]> By: Vera Gottlieb http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9739 Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:30:10 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9739 Why suspect Iran alone? For that matter, any country that has nuclear reactors would be capable of producing nuclear weapons. And it should be remembered who, for the most part, sold these countries the items required: the USA!

]]> By: The folly of the Israeli AND Arab approach to Iran http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9732 Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:11:35 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9732 [...] http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-ma… Posted in Zionist Threat « Who, Precisely, Is Attacking the World? [...]

]]> By: Tom Mysiewicz http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9730 Thu, 02 Dec 2010 05:00:00 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9730 Wasn’t it Saudi fears of Saddam part of the reason (the public reason) for the reckless invasion of Iraq, which benefitted Israeli strategic planners at U.S. expense? This seems like a replay. As for 9-11, no structure like the WTC had ever collapsed from fire. One such structure burned hotter for a week and did not collapse. To have this happen THREE (3) times in close succession is almost beyond the realm of possibility. Remember that WTC 7–not hit with major debris or afflicted by significant fire–collapsed in exactly the same way. And the BBC reported the collapse BEFORE it happened. I suppose the plane destined for it was shot down somewhere in a Pennsylvania field…

]]> By: Cllr David Durant http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9712 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 18:22:10 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9712 From an Iranian point of view it makes emotional sense to acquire nuclear weapons (Israel already has them), because if America is prepared to bomb a country (Iraq) with no WMD, then the lesson learnt is, you may as well get some to use back.

A view encouraged by the fact that American troops are on their borders in Afghanistan and Iraq and with the neocons in Washington calling for a ‘pre-emptive’ strike on Iran’s non-existent WMDs – allegedly with Arab support!

A sense of siege reinforced by Obama’s refusal to show respect for the ancient Persian nation, by holding direct talks.

But, militarily it is not in Iran’s interest to acquire nuclear weapons and they have said it is against their Muslim faith to do so.

Getting WMD would weaken Iran, because it would set off an arms race, alarm their neighbours including Russia and Turkey and divert resources away from conventional forces which are more effective weapons! And they would be bombed before they could actually produce a bomb.

Has Britain benefited in Iraq or Afghanistan, by possessing nuclear weapons? No.

Iran is a regional power, particularly following the destruction of Iraq, but it is not an imperial power and has repeatedly offered to talk and take part in a comprehensive peace conference to resolve middle east issues.

But this peaceful approach is rebuffed by the neocons whose motto is, we fear talking, more than we fear war.

]]> By: Sabretache http://www.alanhart.net/the-folly-of-the-israeli-and-arab-approach-to-iran-and-is-wikileaks-being-manipulated-by-an-intelligence-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9705 Wed, 01 Dec 2010 13:44:23 +0000 http://www.alanhart.net/?p=1362#comment-9705 The extent of the disconnect between the populations of most Arab countries and their Israel-supporting governments is quite breathtaking too.

See the latest annual Zogby poll of Middle-Eastern opinion at: https://wikispooks.com/wiki/File:Arab_Opinion_Poll_2010.pdf

]]>