Comments on: Will the blackmail of British Jewish funders backfire?

By: pabelmont

pabelmont — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:13:54 +0000

Going to a fund raising dinner was “too toxic” for them. Not sure what that “toxic” means. Did these Jewish political-donor-types mean that they personally would be upset by the thought of giving to Milliband or did they mean that they would themselves be injured within their social networks if it became known that they had done so (or if they called within these networks to ask donations for Milliband)?

In short, my question is, is the blackmail solely against Milliband, or is it also a manipulative device for the social (that is strongly pro-Israel) regimentation of big Jewish political-donors?

By: Hamdy

Hamdy — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:30:25 +0000

Our democratic system has been corrupted by the wealthy elites using election campaign funding to buy politicians, most of whom are willing to sell themselves to the best bidder. As a result, we live in a plutocracy. The only way to have real democracy is through funding the elections from the public purse. This cannot be done through the legislature. It has to be a grassroots movement of people of all political inclinations as described under the New Era Reformist clubs at http://www.TheNewEraClubs.com.

By: Sami

Sami — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 06:32:54 +0000

I think all brouhaha is part and parcel of the deception charade.

By: Sami

Sami — Wed, 12 Nov 2014 06:31:57 +0000

I think it all brouhaha is part and parcel of the deception charade.

By: Rehmat

Rehmat — Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:33:16 +0000

Mr. Hart – I have no doubt in my mind that nothing is going to change in UK and United States when it comes to the interests of Israel – as long as greedy and corrupt anti-Muslim politicians keep returning in the parliaments.

Ed Miliband was born into a Zionist Jewish family. Some of his family members have lived in Israel. Ed visited the Zionist entity in April this year. On his return he told UK’s Jewish Lobby leaders that as UK’s next prime minister he would serve Israel’s interests better than country’s current prime minister David Cameron, an Israeli poodle. He also stated that a nuclear Iran is not only an “existential threat” to Israel but also big threat to the rest of the world.

It seems, both Ed Miliband and Douglas Alexander forgot Natan Sharansky’s definition of Jewishness, which revolves around Talmud’s G-d and state of Israel. He also failed to learn from his elder brother David Miliband’s experience as former foreign secretary, who in 2010 announced that British government’s decision to expel an “un-named Israeli diplomat” in response to UK passports being used in the Dubai assassination of one of Hamas’ leading freedom-fighters, Mahmoud al-Mabhouh – two members of Israeli Knesset, Aryeh Eldad and Michael Ben-Ari, called David Miliband and the entire British nation Zionist dogs.

http://rehmat1.com/2010/03/26/israels-british-zionist-dogs/