Comments on: Zionist lobby’s new orders for Obama

By: Kourosh Ziabari: Satisfying the Zionists: Obama’s first priority | My Catbird Seat

Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:54:32 +0000

[...] Obama to refuse to recognize an independent Palestinian nation. Former BBC Panorama presenter Alan Hart believes that this resolution was drafted by AIPAC and is considered to be the Zionist lobby’s new order for Obama. The resolution has [...]

By: Zionist Lobby’s New Orders For Obama « archersofokcular

Zionist Lobby’s New Orders For Obama « archersofokcular — Sun, 13 Mar 2011 18:40:31 +0000

[...] Zionist lobby’s new orders for Obama [...]

By: rosemary spiota

rosemary spiota — Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:32:07 +0000

“principles underlying the Oslo accords” can only be a sick joke, which Netanyahu fulfilled his promise to destroy. There is no peace process, and no desire for peace by Israel. Why would it, with free WMD, and (im)moral support by the US? I agree with Alan that now the bribe has been rebuffed by Israel,the US has no agreement to veto criticism. The US population in polls has shown it is not in AIPAC’s pocket.

By: el sionismo y obhama « Visión Universitaria

el sionismo y obhama « Visión Universitaria — Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:03:27 +0000

[...] Fuente: http://www.alanhart.net/zionist-lobbys-new-orders-for-obama/#more-1389 [...]

By: Tom Mysiewicz

Tom Mysiewicz — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:27:10 +0000

Berman may be living proof that the U.S. Constitution is no longer the law of the land and the U.S. is governed by “something else”. The Constitution spells out foreign policy as being in the realm of the Executive Branch (President and his cabinet). The Legislative Branch (Congress & Senate) is to vote on any treaties proposed by the Executive Branch. In this case, the Legislative Branch is attempting to usurp the power of the Executive Branch. This is attacking the very system of checks and balances puit into place by the Founding Fathers. Berman–unless he was not sworn in–took an oath “…to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic”–and so should be tried for treason for introducing such a bill.

By: GUIA de NOTICIAS ALTERNATIVAS : ¿Obedecerá Obama las últimas órdenes del sionismo?

Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:43:31 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Robert Battersby

Robert Battersby — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 10:27:44 +0000

House Resolution 1734 is a prime example of the Zionist enterprise showing its true rotten colours. The thought of Meir Kahane comes to mind here. Meir Kahane had the insane vision of a Greater Israel occupying land between the Nile and the Euphrates taking in part of Egypt, Jordan, Syria Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Doubtless the Israeli Zionist “visionaries” and their corporate backers look at the oilfields of Saudi Arabia & Iraq with envy. One wonders “Is this their real agenda?”.
I like Alan’s suggestion of making the financial support to Israel a loan not a gift. At present they are giving power to Israel (over them). If they lend them money, they have power over Israel, the way they treat every other country. I expect the Bermans, the Liebermans etc. to oppose this but they need to get Israel to pay its way. Money is power and the Zionists exert control by that rule. Beat them at their own game.

By: Cllr David Durant

Cllr David Durant — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 08:43:30 +0000

Getting the resolution passed unanimously is an impressive show of influence, but a sign of panic for the same reason.

This is because by tradition the zionists like to act behind the scenes and allow useful idiots to do their dirty work and misrepresent the issues in public.

Having to take on this role themselves is a sign of panic, because it’s a bit like a vampire being forced to venture out in daylight.

And it reveals the significance of international recognition of Palestinian statehood. In one audacious move, the powerful zionist lobby faces being outflanked and legally portrayed as the problem and defeated!

Also a unanimous vote on a contentious issue is not natural and must involve coercion. Recognition of Palestinian statehood would remove this coercion. And once this coercion is removed the whole house collapses (just like the Berlin Wall).

But will Obama do it? Personally I believe he wants to, but is worried about the impact on domestic politics. But if he does, it is a game changer and will suddenly have cross party support.

By: Paul de Burgh-Day

Paul de Burgh-Day — Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:50:23 +0000

Here’s to AIPAC ‘losing it’s grip”, or even better, beginning to panic!
Unless this world is able to blow away the darkly evil shroud of Zionism, nothing will arrest the headlong rush into a new dark age.