Human Rights v Tyranny
King’s staggering achievement is testament to what can be achieved by a man – or a woman – possessed of clear conviction and rightly positioned on the side of justice and freedom. And it is a testament to the power of people united, physically gathering together so that they must be counted and considered, where they can no longer be ignored or written off.
My second and related verbal footnote is this. At the end of last month the House of Commons voted against Britain’s participation in an American-led attack on Syria. One of the reasons why it did so was that enough members of parliament were NOT prepared to ignore and write off the concerns of a majority of the British people, the voters. Days later there were indications that a majority in Congress was not going to give Obama the green light to attack Syria because, it seemed, most members (unlike their president – question mark) were more frightened of offending their voters than they were of offending the Zionist lobby and its fundamentalist, mad, Christian and neo-con allies.
What happened at Westminster and might well have happened in Washington D.C. was confirmation for me that the citizens of nations, the voters, DO have the power to insist that governments change the world for the better. It really is time for that power, people power, to be unleashed, peacefully of course, if the cause of human rights is to be advanced.
Thank you.
Page 6 of 6 | Previous page
Joe Ortiz:
September 20th, 2013 at 8:59 am
Alan, I admire your remarks and well-structured concerns. I would say that any intelligent (or even intellectual)human being would conclude your statement is not over-stated, except for one thing: You fail to clearly name (or call out) the culprits, as well as failure to suggest how we (mankind)can solve this problem.
Most of us pundits (in the know)have sufficient knowledge and recognize who the enemy is. You can call them Jesuits, Zionists, Freemasons, Illuminati, Bilderbergs, CFR, Committee of 300, or whatever (I call them Mammonites), they are groups of people whose only concerns is to amass enough power and money to control humanity and to outright destroy Christianity and any or all who believe in Jesus Christ.
They already have control of most of the world government’s leaders and finances, including the United States. All of humanity is in their clutches and power. Yet, most of those in the know, would rather comment or beat to death minor issues(such as how many Jews were killed during the 2 WW)rather than directly point the finger, in fear of being labeled an “Anti-Semite.”
I work all day long compiling more than sufficient data, which there is a plethora of it documented on the Internet and other sources, (if only people are wise enough and take the time to know where to look) and I present as much of this evidence as I can (to the masses), especially to those who call themselves Christian, but who are mere Zionist puppets and dupes who are being controlled by the extremely clever Mammonite Media Manipulators, which includes many clever bloggers I can name, which will be accomplished in the near future.
Shalom!
Joe Ortiz, author
Why Christians Will Suffer Great Tribulation
The End Times Passover
Saved? What Do You Mean Saved?
Elizabeth Morley:
September 20th, 2013 at 11:53 am
Lovely to see you back in action, Alan! Thank you for sharing this speech. You are absolutely right about the selective application of human rights by governments. A recent example: After losing the vote on the Syria (armed intervention) motion, David Cameron told the House of Commons “I got that”. We may have thought that meant he understood that the people and their representatives wanted no more war. A fortnight later he spoke for the first time in public about that event. And what he told his listeners (the Holocauast Educational Trust) was not that he understood that the people wanted no more war – oh no! But that their representatives (and presumably also they themselves) would later feel ashamed for having forgotten the lessons of the Holocaust. Yet when Israel bombed Gaza for three weeks with white phosphorus, I don’t recall him wagging his finger at the prime minister of the time saying: “Remember the lessons of the Holocaust; otherwise, if you take no action against Israel now, you will later feel ashamed.”
Fakhri:
September 21st, 2013 at 10:06 am
Good to see’re you back, Alan, and hope you will continue.
Your post is not only head-on right, but is an absolute necessity
to remind everybody of who the real culprits fighting against our
humanity are. Yes, they are the USA and the West. Obama was framed by Kerry- both massive hypocrites- a fortnight ago, and almost went to war against another Middle East country under a flimsy pretext based on a doctored video by American stooges.He couldn’t have cared less how many thousands he would have killed or how many refugees or displaced people created or how many symbols of culture he would have destroyed!All under a false pretence based on un-substanciated claims.Is it any use reiterating what Agent Orange did to Vietnamese villagers living in poverty?We all know of the frightening numbers of deformed foetuses and newborns in Falluga city in Iraq following the visits of American boots nine years ago.Need we recite Hiroshima and Nagasaki?How about the depleted uranium the Israelis used in south Lebanon in 2006 or the white phosphorus they used in Gaza in 2008 and 2011?
True the UN in its current set-up is out-dated and ineffective; but if and when it is reformed, the new UN must address some old business.By the same token that German officers were tried post-WW2,or the late Slobodan Milosevic were tried post-WW2,the big murderers of post-1945 roaming free or more bizarrely awarded diplomatic posts, must be tried and handed their deserved punishments.The International Criminal Court must have the reach and the teeth to bring big criminals like George W Bush& Tony Blair and Ihud Barack& Gabi Ashkenazi to trial,better than chasing some petty criminals in Africa.This last quote illustrates the absurdity of the UN organs, as their might can be leashed only against the weakest and the poorest.
Until that ailment is redressed, the world will continue to be a big jungle, and the biggest beasts will continue to diturb and upset the peace on our earth.
Sami:
September 23rd, 2013 at 8:57 pm
A great speech, indeed.
Incidentally, the defeat in the Commons of the motion to attack Syria was largely due to party politics. I believe the opposition tabled a minor amendment which was also defeated in a tit for tat fashion. In other words, if I am not mistaken, both parties were willing to ignore public opinion, but party politics saved the day! In fact public opposition to the war on Iraq was even greater, but the ‘lobby’ made sure then that there was consensus.
Bob Battersby:
October 9th, 2013 at 12:06 am
I’ve always thought that Laws and Rights are opposites. Laws create and protect élites and their power and dominance over others. Rights empower all and create citizens. Police and military are mobilised for laws against rights. The opposite should be the case but that élite control them.
Bob Battersby:
October 9th, 2013 at 12:08 am
We can still turn Psychopaths from ruthless genocide warriors into wanton children which is where they need to be if we want to.
Bob Battersby:
October 9th, 2013 at 12:13 am
The élites of this world believe in Poverty as they see it as the basis of their wealth.
Patrick Colquhoun, a merchant who set up England’s first private “preventative police “ force to prevent dock workers from supplementing their meager wages with stolen goods, provided what may be the most lucid explanation of how hunger and poverty correlate to productivity and wealth creation:
Poverty is that state and condition in society where the individual has no surplus labour in store, or, in other words, no property or means of subsistence but what is derived from the constant exercise of industry in the various occupations of life. Poverty is therefore a most necessary and indispensable ingredient in society, without which nations and communities could not exist in a state of civilization. It is the lot of man. It is the source of wealth, since without poverty, there could be no labour; there could be no riches, no refinement, no comfort, and no benefit to those who may be possessed of wealth.
This is what our so called élite think. Make of it what you will.
No way:
November 2nd, 2013 at 3:58 pm
I’m glad to see you back….