
As the worst refugee crisis since World War II and one with the potential to overwhelm Europe as well as Lebanon and Jordan was gathering momentum (as it still is), the headline over an article in The New York Times by Roger Cohen was Obama’s Syrian Nightmare. Cohen’s opening shot was, “Syria will be the biggest blot on the Obama presidency, a debacle of staggering proportions.””
On the same day Patrick Cockburn said in an article in The Independent that “the mass flight of people will go on as long as the war in Syria and Iraq continues.” (He also noted that there were civil wars in nine Islamic countries and that “none of them show any sign of ending.”)
I agree with Cockburn’s assessment and also that of Jamal Kanj, a Palestinian refugee and the author of the book Children of Catastrophe. (Kanj grew up in a refugee camp in Lebanon and emigrated to the U.S. where he became an engineer). His view of what is most likely to happen in Syria is the following.
QUOTE
As things stand, we’re on a trajectory for Syria to become even more horrific than it is now. Many experts expect the war to drag on for years, kill hundreds of thousands more people, and lead to an exodus of millions more refugees. We’re likely to see street-to-street fighting soon in Damascus, lifting the suffering and emigration to a new level.
UNQUOTE
In his article Cohen acknowledged that President Obama does have some important foreign policy achievements to his credit, most notably the breakthrough agreements with Iran and Cuba “which took courage and persistence”. (In parenthesis Cockburn added that how those two agreements will play out remains to be seen “but they constitute a victory over sterile confrontation.”)
But on Syria Obama has shown no courage or persistence. Cohen put it this way.
QUOTE
In 2011, Obama said, “The time has come for President Assad to step aside.” At that time, as events have shown, the president had no policy in place to achieve that objective and no will to forge such a policy. His words were of a grave irresponsibility.
UNQUOTE
The question arising is this.
IF Obama had had the will was there anything he could have done to end Syria’s nightmare when it became clear very soon after the start of the Arab Spring uprising there in March 2011 that Assad was not listening to the voices of his people and that there were no limits to the amount of death and destruction he was prepared to preside over to keep himself in power?
My answer is an emphatic yes. He could have had a dialogue with President Putin in which he said something like the following to him.
“What’s your price for working with Iran to oblige Assad to stand down, to make way for new elections which will be supervised by the international community with Russian and Iranian representatives playing a full part in the supervision?”
Because containing and hopefully defeating perverted, violent Islamic fundamentalism was as much a priority for Russia as it was (ought to have been) for America and Western Europe, my speculation is that Putin’s response would have been positive.
In other words… If Obama had demonstrated real leadership in such a way, I think the countdown to catastrophe for Syria, the region and possibly the whole world could have been stopped.
And that’s why I agree with Cohen. Syria will be the biggest blot on the Obama presidency, “a debacle of staggering proportions.”
If I could put a question directly to President Obama it would be this.
Did the idea of seeking and securing Putin’s assistance in the way I have suggested ever cross your mind and, if it did, why did you not persist with it? And if it didn’t cross your mind, why not?
But events in Syria (and Iraq) and their consequences have proved that it’s not only in America that there’s a lack of leadership . The message of the failure to address the causes of the refugee problem is that there are no real leaders anywhere on Planet Earth.
What in my view is a “real” leader?
One who puts the best interests of his or her own country first but who does so within the framework of doing what is best for all of humanity.
I’ll conclude by saying that I have some sympathy for Obama. I believe that he would like to be a real leader. I even flirt with the idea (sometimes) that if was free to put America’s own best interests first, he would put Netanyahu’s Israel on notice that if it did not end its defiance of international law and its denial of justice for the Palestinians it would be isolated and sanctioned, with America participating in the sanctioning process.
But like all occupants of the White House Obama is not free. He is the prisoner of a corrupt political system with what passes for democracy for sale to the highest lobby bidders.
Even the Editorial Board of The New York Times seems to be a little concerned about this corruption. On 13 September its editorial with the headline Candidates Afloat On A Sluice of Money opened with the following thought (my emphasis added).
“When the Republican presidential candidates debate this week, it would help if voters could hear them offer detailed proposals for dealing with the 800-pound fat cat in the room – superrich donors who are making enormous, often untraceable contributions that undoubtedly tie candidates to special-interest agendas”
UPDATE
Russia is now reinforcing Syria’s war machine because Putin seems to believe that Assad has to remain in power if the forces of perverted, violent Islamic fundamentalism are to be contained and eventually defeated. And Putin is not alone in this way of thinking. There are voices in the West which are saying that their governments must do the unthinkable and accept that Assad has to be part of a political solution.
My own speculation is that even if Obama did a 180 degree u-turn and agreed to this, crushing the forces of perverted and violent Islamic fundamentalism and putting them out of business completely may now be a mission impossible. Because of the initial failure of leadership by Obama and others.
If you liked this post, then...
- Share it with others using this button:
- Comment on it using the form below.
- Subscribe to my blog via email or RSS to get "new post" alerts.
- Follow me on Twitter (@alanauthor).
First -- privatization means there is no public interest, period. Hardly surprising then that there are no leaders! Leaders of what? Arms Merchants? Bib Corporations? What?
Second -- We have civil war in nine Islamic countries. Civil war, refugees, American and Zionist interests ....hm......I think maybe this is just the Zionisation of the entire region, reflecting the battle for complete regional hegemony between Tehran and Jerusalem.
Let's just call this dynamic, The Big Nakba.
Help US, DEAR God ! For we Know not WHAT TO DO !! This Is Surely The Prayer of Multitudes This Day.. If ever this Country needed a Leader with Some Leadership Qualities ..IT is Now. How Are we to Blunder our way thru this Maze of Smokescreens and absolute insanity...when Chaos is All Around ? Who Will Lead us thru when it IS so Clear The Cause of this madness and mayhem ? Are we Grasping at Straws...Looking to Mr. D. Trump to Save us...AND Hoping J. Cortyn to take control and Lead the way ? Is That Pure insanity ? Or Grasping at Straws in a Windstorm ?? Time will tell > Do we have Time ?
To understand who is behind all acts of evil, just listen to the very short clip, with English subtitles, at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGeZgPeuRJ8
As for the Iran agreement, it is just an interim measure because the American armed forces are currently not only overstretched, but in the planning stage of a potentially catastrophic adventure to take on the Russian bear.
Who are 'puppeteers' behind all these acts of evil? Well, shall we call them the Illuminati?
The US should stop financing Israel and putting Russia under pressure. ISIS leaders were photograped with McCain years ago and seen by the whole world except apparently you.
Dear Hart - I'm really disappointed that you failed to figure out who these so-called "Islamic Fundamentalists" are and why Netanyahu loves them?
In June 2014, Netanyahu in his first comment on ISIS victory in Iraq, said that Washington should stay out of the Iraqi conflict – and let the Sunni militants defeat the Shia-dominated government of prime minister al-Maliki and break-up Iraq. “This will weaken Iranian influence in the Arab region,” said Netanyahu during his address at Tel Aviv University’s INSS think-tank.
http://rehmat1.com/2014/06/30/netanyahu-isis-is-good-for-israel/
WOW ! Are we All Complete and Utter Nuts ?? Why in the World Can`t we EVER Learn to Listen to WISE and Oh So Willing to Put his Two=cents'worth in Everywhere he can get one foot in the door.. like in Our Congress ?? ) B. Netty, and Follow His Every Directive ?? Isn`t it Clear even YET That He Is 'NEXT TO GOD and Knows BESSST''' ..Do you Get the Drift ? And Now.. The Real Fact! Put b.Netty in a Box And Ship him to Anywhere He Has no Air to Breath..And No Microphone. The Whole World Will Be better off..Certainly safer..with this EGO-Maniac Out of The 'picture'.
No the Ukraine was the biggest mistake of the Obama administration. They lost that one. Syria is not over but doesn't look good for the USA so it will be epic fail #2.
Syria has not gone the way of Libya and it all comes down to those 80 surface to ship missiles that Syria bought from Russia when they saw what happened in Libya. If the USA declares a no fly zone or starts attacking directly like they did in Libya they will lose ships and hundreds if not thousands of navy personnel.
The Qatari gas pipeline to Europe was the USA's main strategy to break Russia's energy hold on Europe and deprive it of its largest customer. The pipeline has to go through Syria or the USA had to deal with Assad. They thought it would be easier to just get rid of him. Hasn't worked out that way so far.
Now with Russia reinforcing Syria's armaments and supplying mercenaries along with Iran it looks like Assad will not be toppled. So much for the pipleline for now anyway.
Thanks for your so accurate analysis